The evidence workflow

Identify the exact title and supplier. Read the primary product page, preserve its figures and record omissions. Match images to the correct edition. Write the interpretation separately from the supplier fact. Finally check links, visible metadata and consistency across the comparison.

The 70-point research rubric

CriterionMaximumCurrent assessment rule
Mechanics documentation2015 for a named mechanic and layout; 20 requires complete documented evaluation rules
Feature documentation158 for named features; 13 for a stated trigger and award; 15 requires complete trigger/retrigger detail
RTP transparency150 where the cited source omits RTP
Risk clarity1010 for an explicit supplier volatility label, labelled as such
Paytable completeness50 without a complete publicly documented paytable
Provider provenance55 for an identifiable official source

The calculation is visible

Add the documented points, divide by 70 and multiply by 10. Round once to one decimal place. The current original-game calculation is (15 + 8 + 0 + 10 + 0 + 5) ÷ 70 × 10 = 5.4. Deluxe scores 6.1 because its source specifies a trigger and initial award.

These are source-coverage assessments. A missing RTP lowers documentation coverage; it is not proof that the game’s actual RTP is poor.

What is not scored

The full 100-point framework reserves 15 for measured mobile experience, 10 for observed interface quality and 5 for originality assessed through actual play. No launch review receives those 30 points. No hands-on total is assigned.

Publication and update controls

Article dates record substantive publication or checking, not an automatic daily refresh. A changed specification should receive a note identifying the affected field and source. A catalogue record is not promoted to a full review until the editorial sections and evidence have been completed.

THE EVIDENCE RECORD

Sources & update history

Published and source-checked: 22 September 2026. Launch version. Provider images and public-source research; no wagered session is claimed.

Editorial policy · Report a correction
Super Ace Editorial Desk

AI-assisted source research and editorial explanation. Named human review has not yet been confirmed.

About this byline ↗