The short answer, edition by edition

None of the 6 official JILI product pages lists an RTP percentage. Our archived copies of those pages were checked again for this note and contain no RTP line at all. That already sets the scope of this note: everything below is a third-party figure, and the job is to decide how much weight each one can carry. For the general meaning of RTP and a worked example in pesos, read our RTP guide. This page does not repeat it.

The result of the audit is narrow. Only the original Super Ace has a figure that independent databases agree on. The other 5 editions have either no figure, a figure for a different build, or a figure printed next to facts that are wrong for the game.

EditionOfficial JILI pageStrongest third-party figureOur grade
Super AceNo RTP · 10,000× max win97% in 3 independent databasesB · databases agree
Super Ace DeluxeNo RTP · 10,000× max win97.00% beside a 5,000× max winRejected · contradicts JILI
Super Ace JokerNo RTP · 10,000× max win96% for a JILI.US listingDifferent build · not transferable
Super Ace 2No RTP · 10,000× max win97.00% beside a 5,000× max winRejected · contradicts JILI
3 Super AceNo RTP · 10,000× max win96% for a JILI.US listingDifferent build · not transferable
Super Ace SPEEDNo RTP · 375× max winNo listing foundUnverified

The evidence ladder we used

A percentage is only as good as the document it comes from. We sort every RTP claim into the same five levels used across our research data, from strongest to weakest, and we never promote a figure up the ladder because it is repeated often.

Level A: the provider, or the game you actually load

A provider document naming the exact title, such as a game sheet, or the information screen inside the build your operator serves. For the Super Ace family no provider document with a percentage exists in our capture: JILI's pages omit it and no game sheet was published for any of the 6 editions.

Level B: two or more independent databases agree

Separate slot databases list the same figure for the same game, and nothing on those listings contradicts the official facts. The original Super Ace reaches this level: 3 databases print 97%.

Level C: one source

A single listing with no contradiction and no second confirmation. Usable as a lead to check in the game, not as a fact.

Unverified, and rejected

Unverified means no usable figure was found. Rejected means a figure exists but the same listing gets basic official facts wrong, so it is probably describing a different game or a placeholder entry. A figure attached to a different build label is kept apart from all levels, because it may be accurate and still not describe the game on a Philippine lobby.

Why 97% for the original is the strongest figure, and still not proof

For Super Ace, 3 independent databases list 97%, and none of them disagrees with the official 10,000× max win or the 1,024-way layout. That is the only Level B figure in the family. It is a reasonable expectation for a standard build of the original, and it is the figure our catalogue data carries at confidence B.

It is still not a provider statement. Agreement between databases can mean they read the same upstream figure, not that each checked the game. Treat 97% as the most likely value for the original only, and confirm it in the game you open. It does not transfer to Deluxe, Joker, Super Ace 2, 3 Super Ace or SPEED, which are separate games with their own maths.

The JILI.US 96%: accurate for a different build

One database lists Super Ace Joker and 3 Super Ace at 96%. Both entries are filed under a separate software label, JILI.US, rather than under JILI, and both carry release dates that do not match JILI's own publish times.

  • Super Ace Joker: JILI publishes March 2025; the JILI.US listing gives August 2025, 5 months later.
  • 3 Super Ace: JILI publishes March 2026; the JILI.US listing gives May 2026, 2 months later.
  • The same database files Super Ace 2 under a different label again and shows its RTP as Pending, so the 96% is not a family-wide value either.

Why a US build figure does not describe the Asian build

RTP is a setting of a particular build, not a property of a title. A later release under a separate label is a separate distribution of the game, and it can ship with its own return setting. The listing tells you what that build was configured at when the database recorded it. It says nothing about the version a Philippine operator loads from JILI's Asian catalogue.

The practical reading: a 96% figure for Joker or 3 Super Ace is a plausible range marker, not the number for your game. Only the information screen of the build you open can settle it.

Two listings we rejected: Super Ace 2 and Deluxe at 97.00%

An independent slot database lists both Super Ace 2 and Super Ace Deluxe at 97.00%. On the same pages it gives a 5,000× max win for both, exactly half of the 10,000× that JILI publishes for each. We re-opened both listings for this note and compared 4 basic facts with the official pages. All 4 disagree for both games.

FactSuper Ace 2: JILI vs listingDeluxe: JILI vs listing
Max win10,000× vs 5,000×10,000× vs 5,000×
Layout4×5, 1,024 ways vs 5×3, 20 lines4×5, 1,024 ways vs 5×3, 20 lines
VolatilityMedium vs Medium-HighMedium vs Medium-High
ReleaseJuly 2025 vs August 2024July 2024 vs January 2024

Why one wrong fact sinks the whole listing

A listing that cannot get the grid, the ceiling or the launch month right is not describing the game JILI publishes. Its percentage may belong to another title, an early placeholder or a copied template. Keeping the RTP while discarding the rest would be choosing the one number that happens to look plausible. Both editions therefore stay unverified on this site, and 97% should not be quoted for either of them.

What the provider game sheets teach, even without a Super Ace sheet

JILI's distribution partner publishes technical game sheets for part of the catalogue. Super Ace editorial analysis of the 42 sheets captured on 24 Sep 2026 found none for any Super Ace edition; the original appears in that partner's catalogue without a sheet, and the other five editions are not listed there. The sheets that do exist still answer a useful question: does one title always have one RTP?

What the sheet showsSheetsDetail
One total RTP32From 96.48% to 97.34%, median 97.00%
Several RTP settings9Fortune Gems lists 6, from 98.50% down to 96.01%
No total RTP printed1Sheet exists, field left empty

One title, several settings

9 of the 42 sheets list more than one RTP for the same game. Fortune Gems alone spans 2.49 percentage points across 6 settings. The operator chooses the setting, which is exactly why a figure found online can be right for one casino and wrong for another, and why no Super Ace edition should be quoted as a single fixed RTP.

Namesakes are not relatives

Two JILI games with Ace in the name do have sheets: Wild Ace at 97.05% and Mega Ace at 97.31%. Neither is a Super Ace edition. Wild Ace caps at 1,000× and Mega Ace runs 46,656 ways with a 1,500× ceiling, so their figures say nothing about the Super Ace family.

Why search results look more certain than they are

Our 24 Sep 2026 capture of public pages quoting an RTP for these editions collected 30 results carrying 13 different values, from 95.00% to 98.10%. Most are casino and promotional pages that restate a number without naming a build. For Super Ace SPEED, every result in that capture was actually about the original Super Ace or a general game list, so none of those figures applies to SPEED.

A spread that wide is itself the finding: without a build identifier, a stated RTP cannot be checked, and repetition does not make it stronger.

How to read RTP in the game's own information screen

The only figure that describes the game in front of you is the one the build itself shows. Operators and builds differ, so treat these as checks rather than a map of one specific menu.

  • Open the game, then its menu or information button, and page through the rules and paytable screens before placing a stake.
  • Match the full title on the loading screen to the edition. The Super Ace 2 cover, for example, reads Super Ace 2 Stack; the name in a lobby tile is often shortened.
  • Look for a line such as RTP, return to player or theoretical return. If the build shows none, the correct answer for that game is not disclosed, not the figure from a website.
  • Check paid modes separately. Super Ace SPEED lists an optional Extra Bet on its official page, and a paid mode can carry its own return figure.
  • Record what you see: date, operator, full title and a screenshot. A dated screenshot is stronger evidence than any figure on this page.

The six editions and where each figure stands

Provider covers, captioned with the official max win and the grade from this audit. Each figure applies to that edition only.

Super Ace official JILI cover art
Super Ace · 10,000× · 97% · grade B
Super Ace Deluxe official JILI cover art
Super Ace Deluxe · 10,000× · RTP rejected
Super Ace Joker official JILI cover art
Super Ace Joker · 10,000× · US build only
Super Ace 2 official JILI cover art
Super Ace 2 · 10,000× · RTP rejected
3 Super Ace official JILI cover art
3 Super Ace · 10,000× · US build only
Super Ace SPEED official JILI cover art
Super Ace SPEED · 375× · RTP unverified

Consistency check against our own pages

Before publishing, we checked every edition review, guide and news note on this site for an RTP percentage attached to a Super Ace edition. None states one: all 6 edition reviews keep RTP marked as not published, which matches the evidence above. One stale count was corrected: the RTP guide still said five official pages had been checked, although the collection has covered six editions since Super Ace SPEED joined, as noted in our six-edition reference note.

The provider volatility labels on our pages also stay as JILI publishes them. The rejected listings describe Super Ace 2 and Deluxe as Medium-High, while JILI labels both Medium; the volatility guide explains what that label does and does not tell you.

Method and limits

Sources, all captured or re-checked on 24 Sep 2026: the 6 official JILI product pages and our archived copies of them; our research dataset, which grades each RTP field A, B, C or unverified with its evidence; independent slot database listings, including a re-check of the two rejected pages; the 42 provider game sheets captured that day; and a capture of public search results. Every number on this page is computed from those files when the site is built, and the build stops if a figure no longer supports a sentence.

Limits: no game was opened in an operator lobby for this note and no wagered session was played. Databases and builds change; a figure graded here can be superseded by a provider document or by the information screen of the game you load.

More research notes are collected in Super Ace News & Research Notes. Every edition review starts from the Super Ace homepage comparison.

Questions about Super Ace RTP by edition

What is the RTP of Super Ace?

JILI does not publish one. For the original game, 3 independent databases agree on 97%, the strongest figure available on 24 Sep 2026. Confirm it in the information screen of the build you play.

Does 97% also apply to Super Ace Deluxe and Super Ace 2?

No. The only listing giving them 97.00% also gives a 5,000× max win and other facts that contradict JILI's 10,000×, so we rejected it. Both remain unverified.

Why is Super Ace Joker listed at 96% on some sites?

That figure comes from a listing under a separate JILI.US label with a later release date. It describes that build, not the version a Philippine operator loads.

Is there an RTP for Super Ace SPEED?

No usable figure was found. Pages that appear to quote one are about the original Super Ace. Check the game's information screen, and check the Extra Bet mode separately.

Can the same Super Ace game have different RTPs?

Yes, in principle. 9 of the 42 JILI game sheets we captured list several RTP settings for one title, and the operator chooses which one runs.

THE EVIDENCE RECORD

Sources & update history

Published and source-checked: 24 September 2026. Research note built from the evidence captured that day. Provider images and public-source research; no wagered session is claimed.

Editorial policy · Report a correction
Super Ace Editorial Desk

AI-assisted source research and editorial explanation. Named human review has not yet been confirmed.

About this byline ↗